If you're seeing this message, it means we're having trouble loading external resources on our website.

If you're behind a web filter, please make sure that the domains *.kastatic.org and *.kasandbox.org are unblocked.

Main content

Selective incorporation: lesson overview

Overview

While the Bill of Rights expressly protects citizens’ rights and liberties against infringements by the federal government, it does not explicitly mention infringement or regulation of rights by state governments. Over a succession of rulings, the Supreme Court has established the doctrine of selective incorporation to limit state regulation of civil rights and liberties, holding that many protections of the Bill of Rights apply to every level of government, not just the federal.

Key terms

TermDefinition
Due processthe legal requirement that an individual’s rights must be respected by a state or government; protected at the federal level by the Fifth Amendment, and at the state level by the Fourteenth
Fourteenth Amendmentexplicitly guarantees certain rights against infringement by states, including citizenship, due process, and equal protection for all citizens; before the Amendment’s 1868 adoption, these rights were protected at the Federal level by the Bill of Rights, but not explicitly at the state level
Fundamental rightsrights and immunities protected by the Bill of Rights and interpreted by the Supreme Court as “implicit in the concept of ordered liberty,”1 and therefore protected against state governments in addition to the federal government
Incrementalismthe process of incorporating specific rights and provisions of the Bill of Rights to the state level on a case-by-case basis; compare to total incorporation
Total incorporationa doctrine that applies all the guarantees of the Bill of Rights to the state level without exception; this doctrine has never been adopted by a Supreme Court majority opinion, although several dissenting justices have advocated for it

Cases to know

McDonald v. Chicago (2010) - The first case in which the Second Amendment right to “keep and bear Arms” was incorporated to the states.2 The City of Chicago passed a handgun ban in 1982; Chicago resident Otis McDonald filed a lawsuit challenging the ban in 2008 on the basis that he needed a handgun for self-defense. The Court declared the handgun ban unconstitutional by a 5-4 majority, ruling that the Second Amendment right to bear arms for self-defence is fundamental, and therefore incorporated to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment’s due process clause.
Roe v. Wade (1973) - Norma McCorvey, called by the alias Jane Roe in the court proceedings, wished to terminate her pregnancy but found she could not do so safely or legally in the state of Texas. In the resulting Supreme Court case, the Court ruled that a woman’s decision to have an abortion in the first trimester of pregnancy was protected by the constitutional right to privacy which is incorporated to the states, and that it was therefore unconstitutional for a state to criminalize all abortions.
Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District (1969) - Iowa teenagers Mary Beth Tinker, her brother John, and their friend Christopher Eckhardt were suspended from their public high school for wearing black armbands to protest the Vietnam War. In the resulting case, the Supreme Court ruled that the armbands were a form of symbolic speech, which is protected by the First Amendment and applicable to all levels of government, and therefore the school had violated the students’ First Amendment rights.
Gideon v. Wainwright (1963) The Supreme Court incorporated the Sixth Amendment right to legal counsel at the state level, ruling that state courts were responsible for providing a lawyer to a defendant who could not afford one.

Key takeaways

Limits on state power: Using the doctrine of selective incorporation, the Supreme Court has ruled that many provisions of the Bill of Rights apply to the states. This represents a limiting of state power by federal oversight; any state attempt to regulate individual rights could potentially be ruled unconstitutional by the Court.
To incorporate or not to incorporate? When deciding whether a right is incorporated to the states (and all levels of government), the Court considers whether the right is “implicit in the concept of ordered liberty”, or otherwise “fundamental”. If the right is fundamental, it applies to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment’s due process clause.
Not every right or provision of the Bill of Rights has been incorporated to the states; including those that have never been challenged in the Supreme Court, and those that the Court has specifically ruled non-fundamental, such as the Fifth Amendment’s double jeopardy protection.
Individual freedom and public safety: The tension between public safety considerations and individual rights plays out at all levels of government, and is frequently a factor in cases in which the Court considers selective incorporation. For example, McDonald v Chicago came about because of a city-level handgun ban motivated by public safety, but the Court’s ruling gave primacy to individual rights and reversed the ban.

Review questions

What basis does the Court use to decide whether or not a right is incorporated to the states?
Does selective incorporation limit or increase the power of state governments? How?
From where does the Supreme Court derive its authority to declare state laws unconstitutional? Is it right for the judicial branch to have that authority?

Footnotes

  1. This phrase was first used by Associate Justice Cardozo in his majority opinion for Palko v. Connecticut (1937).
  2. In District of Columbia v. Heller (2008) the Court struck down a handgun ban in a federal district, but this left the question of state incorporation unresolved.

Want to join the conversation?

  • blobby green style avatar for user zhenghuisun2004
    How does the Supreme Court determine whether a right that was listed in the Bill of Rights is fundamental or non-fundamental? For instance, how does the protection of double jeopardy differentiate from rights to a lawyer in the 6th Amendment?
    (10 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
  • blobby green style avatar for user BeejayScott2
    How does selective incorporation limit state infringements of the rights of the accused?
    (9 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
  • starky sapling style avatar for user robertabowman
    How does selective incorporation limit state infringements of the rights of the accused?
    (4 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
  • blobby green style avatar for user neha.ntv
    Isn't the definition of incrementalism actually the definition of selective incorporation?
    (3 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
  • blobby green style avatar for user ashton.mclemore
    Why was the Equal protection clause not used
    (1 vote)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
    • sneak peak yellow style avatar for user William Wang
      Equal Protection is a federal amendment, which means it originally only applied to federal agencies and federal government employees. That said, the 14th Amendment was incorporated (added to) states.

      This is beyond the content of Khan Academy: regarding employment law, this amendment is only for the employee-employer relationship, and independent contractors are not due Equal Protection by their principal (the entity who hires an ind. contractor).
      (1 vote)
  • stelly blue style avatar for user Mal T.
    1. What basis does the Court use to decide whether or not a right is incorporated to the states?
    The court decides whether or not the right is fundamental and interpreted as "implicit in the concept of ordered liberty" before they incorporate it to the states.

    2. Does selective incorporation limit or increase the power of state governments? How?
    Selective incorporation limits the power of the state governments because through federal oversights, bars are placed on the state governments' ability to legislate. For example, because the 2nd amendment was applied to the states through selective incorporation, state governments are now limited with what handgun laws they can impose on the people.

    3. From where does the Supreme Court derive its authority to declare state laws unconstitutional? Is it right for the judicial branch to have that authority?
    The Supreme Court derive its authority to declare state laws unconstitutional from the principle of Judicial review and the concept that the Judicial power of the US is vested within the Supreme Court, which is the highest court of the land. It's alright for the judicial branch and Supreme Court to have that authority because it's their job to interpret and defend the Constitution to make sure it's being honored by the other branches and the states.
    (0 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
  • starky sapling style avatar for user nailahbell
    if selective incorporation is that then what can we do?
    (0 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user